My friends and regular readers of this blog know of my tremendous respect for the expository preaching ministry of John MacArthur. Indeed, his writings were instrumental in my own conversion to saving faith in Jesus Christ, and for that, I shall be (literally) eternally grateful.
I have also had a schizophrenic view of the ministry and writings of Mark Driscoll – at the same time appreciative of his ministry and his commitment to the truth of God’s word, and yet concerned about his language, humor, and approach.
Recently, these two pastors have come into a bit of conflict, stemming from a series of articles that MacArthur has written rebuking Driscoll on a number of fronts, and even going so far as to state that Pastor Driscoll has disqualified himself from the ministry.
Driscoll has not yet responded specifically to MacArthur, so this is most likely not the end of this controversy.
In the meantime, though, I must say that despite my respect for Dr. MacArthur, I am troubled by his approach in this matter. To call for the removal from the pulpit of a pastor, even implicitly, is a very serious call to make and should not be made quickly or easily.
There is much that could be said about this situation, and indeed much has been said, particularly on blogs and in churches which are closely aligned with Dr. MacArthur’s ministry. I do not have much more to say at this point, though I reserve the right to comment later. In the meantime, however, I wanted to share two items of interest, both of which I think are well-stated comments on the situation. The first, a comment on a blog posting summarizing MacArthur’s series, is I think a very well thought out response. The second is an article John Piper wrote which has nothing to do directly with this situation, but, as it deals with pastoral differences, is, in my humble opinion, still very much applicable: