<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Accountability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kubecki.com/blog/2008/04/19/thoughts-onaccountability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kubecki.com/blog/2008/04/19/thoughts-onaccountability/</link>
	<description>"Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own." - Philippians 3:12</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.kubecki.com/blog/2008/04/19/thoughts-onaccountability/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kubecki.com/blog/?p=342#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard this principle applied to relationships.

It goes something like this:

The ideal is the standard we are taught to strive for.  Close enough is a socially acceptable failure to achieve the standard set.

Perfect Ideal (ie: #1) = Abstinence until marriage.  &quot;close enough #1&quot; = intimacy once engaged to be married.

Dropping the standard for the ideal to #2 abstinence until engagement; &quot;close enough&quot; #2 becomes committed, relationship.

degrading further to Ideal #3 &quot;committed relationship&quot;  / close enough #3 becomes &#039;feelings of love&#039;

Ideal #4 &#039;feelings of love&#039; / C.E. #4 &#039;i like that person&#039;

#5 &quot;I like that person&quot; / #5 Close enough = anonymous, casual &#039;because it feels good&#039;.

#6 casual &amp; anonymous / #6 = aggressive, vulgar unspeakable acts

Cheapening of the Ideal results in the magnifying and normalizing of the perversities.

I wish I could remember who I could attribute this to.  Perhaps someone else may remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard this principle applied to relationships.</p>
<p>It goes something like this:</p>
<p>The ideal is the standard we are taught to strive for.  Close enough is a socially acceptable failure to achieve the standard set.</p>
<p>Perfect Ideal (ie: #1) = Abstinence until marriage.  &#8220;close enough #1&#8243; = intimacy once engaged to be married.</p>
<p>Dropping the standard for the ideal to #2 abstinence until engagement; &#8220;close enough&#8221; #2 becomes committed, relationship.</p>
<p>degrading further to Ideal #3 &#8220;committed relationship&#8221;  / close enough #3 becomes &#8216;feelings of love&#8217;</p>
<p>Ideal #4 &#8216;feelings of love&#8217; / C.E. #4 &#8216;i like that person&#8217;</p>
<p>#5 &#8220;I like that person&#8221; / #5 Close enough = anonymous, casual &#8216;because it feels good&#8217;.</p>
<p>#6 casual &amp; anonymous / #6 = aggressive, vulgar unspeakable acts</p>
<p>Cheapening of the Ideal results in the magnifying and normalizing of the perversities.</p>
<p>I wish I could remember who I could attribute this to.  Perhaps someone else may remember.</p>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://www.kubecki.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/tippy/dom_tooltip.css" media="screen" /><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.kubecki.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/tippy/dom_tooltip.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
